On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > HOWEVER, a release cycle of *less than 6 months* would kill the advocacy vols > > if we wanted the same level of publicity. > > > > I do support the idea of "dev" releases. For example, if there was a "dev" > > release of PG+ARC as soon as Jan is done with it, I have one client would > > would be willing to test it against a simulated production load on pretty > > heavy-duty hardware. > > Can't we have nightly builds always available? Why can't they just use > the CVS version?
We do do nightly builds ... have for years now ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
