Peter,
> Hence my original point: the list of supporting companies
> does not primarily belong in the advocacy realm.
But it does! You pointed it out yourself .... for the hackers & OSS tech
people, they can just look at the descriptions of the major contributors and
figure things out for themselves. They don't need a list with company logos
& links.
This is important because we've (people on the Advocacy list) briefly
discussed expanding this page to cover companies which, in the future, make
*financial* contributions to PostgreSQL ... sort of a "corporate donors"
page. This works very well in standard nonprofit fundraising; the project
gets $, and the donors get publicity. Obviously, contributors would have to
be categorized, but that's an issue for when we're ready to set it up.
> > It is there for IT department managers, PHBs, people considering
> > PostgreSQL, and people looking for high-end paid support.
>
> Great, that's exactly what I wanted to hear.
I can't tell over e-mail whether you're agreeing with me or being sarcastic.
Clue?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
