If it doesn't do jsp now, it would be a good starting point for a web
version, as java lends it self well to multiple views.
Dave
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:59, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > >On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hello,
> > >>
> > >> If that is the case that is fine. I just wanted to throw it out there
> > >>but doesn't that mean that
> > >>psql would be separate as well?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >"no new client applications"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > BTW, Joshua, thanks for releasing this - all my client side work is
> > currently Java (a Tomcat webapp in fact) so I'm very interested to see
> > the shape of your app, as I'm sure others are.
>
> D'oh, just clued into the 'java' aspect ... Joshua, will this run as a
> JSP, remotely, through Jakarta-Tomcat? One of the limitations of pgAdmin,
> as far as I'm concerned, is the fact that you can run it remotely ... if
> you could run pgManage under something like Jakarta-Tomcat as a JSP, that
> would be *really* cool ...
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
