Neil Conway wrote:
In the BufferDesc struct, there seem to be two ways to mark a buffer
page as dirty: setting the BM_DIRTY bit mask in the 'flags' field of the
struct, and setting the 'cntxDirty' field to true. What is the
difference between these two indications of a page's dirtiness?

I don't see any either ... could that be some artefact?



Or, more to the point, is there a reason we have two ways to do what looks like the same thing?

BTW, I'd like to remove the behavior that LockBuffer(buf, EXCLUSIVE)
automatically marks the page as dirty. Since there are some situations
in which we acquire an exclusive buffer lock but don't actually end up
modifying the page, this results in dirtying more buffers than are
necessary. I think it's also good practise for code that modifies a
buffer to explicitly mark it as dirty, rather than depending upon
LockBuffer() to do it. Does this sound reasonable, provided I find and
catch all the places that depend upon this behavior? (i.e. and change
them to explicitly mark the buffer as dirty)

Does make sense to me. "Provided you find and catch all" sounds like an "as early as possible in the 7.5 devel cycle" change to me, no?


It also looks to me that we are actually modifying the same sourcecode. We should try to avoid conflicting patches.


On 10/31 you wrote:
I'd rather see us implement a buffer replacement policy that considers
both frequency + recency (unlike LRU, which considers only recency).
Ideally, that would work "automagically". I'm hoping to get a chance to
implement ARC[1] during the 7.5 cycle.

I just posted another fix to my experimental ARC implementation to hackers. From the above I assume you're familiar with the algorithm. Could you please take a look at the "v2" diff and tell me if there's something fundamentally wrong?



Jan


--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to