Neil Conway kirjutas E, 03.11.2003 kell 18:59: > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 11:11, Tom Lane wrote: > > Why not? The advice says that you're going to access the data > > sequentially in the forward direction. If you're not going to back up, > > there is no point in keeping pages in cache after they've been read. > > The advice says: "I'm going to read this data sequentially, going > forward." It doesn't say: "I'm only going to read the data once, and > then not access it again" (ISTM that's what FADV_NOREUSE is for).
They seem like independent features. Can you use combinations like ( FADV_NOREUS | FADV_SEQUENTIAL ) (I obviously have'nt read the spec) ---------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
