On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff? > > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
Me, hardly ever use them :-) So I can assume that removing the implicit pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing." In that case, does my proposed solution of having to implicitly include pg_catalog in your search path to get it to be seen by tab completion as just another schema make sense? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
