Tom Lane writes: > We now have another reason to, which is Chris K-L's point about > unqualified names in the various SQL-language built-in functions. > I am about to commit that fix (with another catversion bump for > good measure...)
Oh dear. We really need this function-specific schema path that the SQL standard seems to talk about. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
