On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since varchar(n) is SQL-standard syntax, can't you simply adopt the more > standard name for both databases? > A long time ago Oracle made the varchar type equivalent to char and once people complained about the excess space used by short entries they came out with varchar2 which they've maintained every since valuing backwards compatability more than the sql standard. Kris Jurka ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
