Manuel Sugawara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I did the es translation of pg_dump and while looking at the code I > found that in several places the char * representation of Oid's is > used instead of the oid itself. Any one knows why is done this > way?
AFAIR pg_dump invariably stores OIDs as strings rather than numbers. This is arguably inefficient, but no one's felt like expending the effort to change it. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org