Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, next question is whether we should use _GNU_SOURCE only for plperl > > compile, rather than everything. _GNU_SOURCE seems to do lots of stuff > > that I am uncertain about. > > We've been using it for awhile, and it's not broken anything. Why are > you so eager to make build changes with potentially wide ramifications > so late in the beta cycle? I didn't agree with your changes to CFLAGS
I don't know what the ramifications of _GNU_SOURCE are, but we have run longer without it than with it. Seems safest to have it only where we need it, in plperl. > yesterday, either. The risk of breaking things on some platform greatly > outweighs the potential benefits at this stage. Well, the compile flags were broken by almost any measure. I don't want to ship without optimization for 7.4 for all those platforms. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
