Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, from an initdb POV I am assuming that we are only interested in > the name=>number conversion, even though initdb.sh does no apparent > checking on the parameter it is passing to pg_encoding. Please tell me > if this is incorrect.
That's correct. I believe we intended to eliminate pg_encoding as a separate program altogether, given a C version of initdb, since the C code could perfectly well call pg_char_to_encoding and pg_valid_server_encoding for itself. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html