Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, from an initdb POV I am assuming that we are only interested in 
> the name=>number conversion, even though initdb.sh does no apparent 
> checking on the parameter it is passing to pg_encoding. Please tell me 
> if this is incorrect.

That's correct.  I believe we intended to eliminate pg_encoding as a
separate program altogether, given a C version of initdb, since the C
code could perfectly well call pg_char_to_encoding and
pg_valid_server_encoding for itself.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to