Patrick Welche wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:49:30PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > ... > > if we are talking two computers sitting next to each other on a switch, > > you'd expect those to be low ... but if you were talking about two > > seperate geographical locations (and yes, I realize you are adding lag to > > the mix with waiting for responses), you'd expect those #s to rise ... > > Which I thought was the whole point of using a group communication protocol > such as spread in postgresql-r. It seemed solved there...
Right, but I think we want to try to do two-phase commit without spread. Spread seems overkill for this usage. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
