BTW, is anyone interested in looking into whether we can be made to build without using either flag? I tried it and saw a number of
I did this... before I knew about -no-cpp-precomp. :( I read all about -traditional-cpp in the gcc man page, but could never find the corresponding "not traditional cpp" flag.
It boiled down to two things: use of macros that used the "stringification" syntax, and whitespace around marco arguments.
Take src/include/nodes/nodes.h, around line 265 for example:
#define makeNode(_type_) ((_type_ *) newNode(sizeof(_type_),T_#_type_)) ... #define IsA(nodeptr, _type_) (nodeTag(nodeptr) == T_#_type_)
gcc 3.3 just didn't like this. So I had to fake it out:
#define T_UNDER() T_
#define makeNode(_type_) ((_type_ *) newNode(sizeof(_type_),T_UNDER()_type_))
...
#define IsA(nodeptr,_type_) (nodeTag(nodeptr) == T_UNDER()_type_)
But it gets better. Apparently with gcc 3.3 whitespace around macro arguments is preserved! So, in the case of calls to (at least) the IsA macro:
before: if (IsA(foo, Short))
after: if (IsA(foo,Short))
^----------------- no space!From what I could tell, the statement would be expanded into (using my re-defined version above):
if (nodeTag(nodeptr) == T_ Short)
which of course isn't legal syntax b/c of the space.
So I went through with some Perl and did a bunch of global substitutions on the files that gcc complained about. There were a few more than the above examples, but not too many.
too. It would be interesting to understand what the problem is.
There it is.
eric
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
