Because MinGW/Msys doesn't come with flex/bison by default, I have addedI vote for requiring MinGW+flex+bison. On *nix you need a similar combination, so why should MinGW be different? If installing flex and bison on MinGW is too hard you probably shouldn't be building out of CVS, ISTM.
those derived files to the WIN32_DEV branch in CVS. It makes it easier
for people to install _just_ MinGW and compile PostgreSQL on Win32. The
branch will live for only 1-2 months until we start 7.5 development. Those files will not be moved into the main branch.
Should those files be in WIN32_DEV CVS, or should they be removed, and require people to install bison/flex on MinGW. Even though they will be updated infrequently, there is concern about CVS file bloat.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match