Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tripple-yuck. :-) > > It doesn't seem to me that we should take on the job of providing > thread-safe implementations of basic libc functions. If a particular > OS cannot manage to offer that functionality, then we should mark it > not-thread-safe and move on. Persons unhappy with this labeling must > take it up with their OS developers, not us.
We do actually have a way to report OS thread failure to the user --- if they ask for --enable-thread-safety, we just throw an error. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
