Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> To what purpose? I think I prefer Andrew Dunstan's approach of allowing
>> IPv4 syntax in pg_hba.conf to match appropriate IPv6 connections.
> I am confused. Andrew Dunstan's approach added a new 'loopback' line
> to pg_hba.conf.
> Andreas Pflug had the patch that treated IPv4 as IPv6.
Ah, my mistake. The patch from Andreas seems like a reasonable thing to
me.
I'm of two minds about 'loopback' --- it's perhaps logically cleaner
than referring to 127.0.0.1, but do we want another special case?
Also, do we really need it if we add Andreas' patch?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
