--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > From UnixWare: >> >> $ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl >> UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 60: argument #3 incompatible >> with prototype: pthread_create() >> UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 61: argument #3 incompatible >> with prototype: pthread_create() >> $ ./test_thread >> Your functions are all thread-safe >> $ > > Well, that's great news, and so clear too! > > I am curious about the compiler warnings. > > What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I > thought a void pointer would be OK for everyone: > > pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void *) func_call_1, NULL);
void *(*start_routine)(void*)
Here is our man page: http://lerami.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.3pthread/pthread_create.3pthre ad. html
Yes, that's what I have too. What if you have the functions taking (void *) rather than void. Does that make the warnings disappear?
$ r cc cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl $ ./test_thread Your functions are all thread-safe $
Attached is my modified version.
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
test_thread.c
Description: Binary data
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
