--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:17:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix the UnixWare (and possibly other) issues.
You said you were working on them, then I see the note that BETA2 was tagged with INVALID shell code in src/templates/unixware, and the per-platform threading stuff BROKEN on UnixWare.
When I left for Las Vegas on 8/16, it was **WORKING**. You committed a change that BROKE it again.
Yes, I'm pissed.
UnixWare==SCO, but the Court fight has **NOTHING** to do with this issue.
Does the PG core not care anymore about **QUALITY**?
I'm NOT going to stand idly by as the SCO/IBM/RED HAT Legal issues are used to hurt PostgreSQL's quality.
I'm NOT very pleased.
SCO's threading support in a beta release is about number 2000 on my list of priorities right now. It will work in final --- that's all I can promise. If that isn't good enough, find someone else who wants to do the work for you.
I am avoiding fixing the SCO port because it would ugilify the other ports --- we need to discuss that, not ram in a fix just to get it working on one platform --- that is quality.
where is the discussion happening?
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
