Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It might be a bit risky getting pg_dump to use it though? > > I definitely don't want pg_dump using the pretty-print stuff ;-). > I'm neutral on whether to use it in psql's \d commands.
I thought the pretty-printing stuff was designed specifically for psql \d and third-party apps like pgadmin. Let's face it, the non-pretty-printing output is "pretty" ugly, and pretty-printing will improve that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
