On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> (Responding to the deafening silence regarding my posts a couple of days
> ago about logging dbnames and disconnections) ;-)
>
> The dbname patch is now done. If nobody objects to the format
> ("[db:yourdbname]") I'll submit it - I did it that way to make it fairly
> easy to split a log file based on it, although you would have to be
> careful with multiline log entries such as query strings. It is
> intentionally minimalist.
>
> I had some thoughts about logging disconnections - I can see a way to do
> it via an on_proc_exit handler, I think. Then I started wondering if it
> might be useful to log session times instead of just noting a disconnect
> and letting the user have to calculate the time.
>
> But I won't bother with this if there's no interest. *I* have no current
> use for it, but I could well imagine others might. (I might too in the
> future if I wanted to debug my connection pooling app).
Actually, I'd certainly like to see it done (both dbname and disconnect).
I'd guess the deafening silence was more because of no objctions than lack
of interest. I know for me it was.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
