On 11/8/17 09:23, Merlin Moncure wrote: > I do wonder how transaction control could be added later. > > The last time I (lightly) looked at this, I was starting to think that > working transaction control into the SPI interface was the wrong > approach; pl/pgsql would have to adopt a very different set of > behaviors if it was called in a function or a proc. If you restricted > language choice to purely SQL, you could work around this problem; SPI > languages would be totally abstracted from those sets of > considerations and you could always call an arbitrary language > function if you needed to. SQL has no flow control but I'm not too > concerned about that.
I have already submitted a separate patch that addresses these questions. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
