Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I've marked the CF entry closed. However, I'm not sure if we're quite
>>> done with this thread. Weren't we going to adjust nbtree and hash to
>>> be more aggressive about labeling their metapages as REGBUF_STANDARD?
>> I have already posted the patches [1] for the same in this thread and
>> those are reviewed [2][3] as well. I have adjusted the comments as per
>> latest commit. Please find updated patches attached.
> Confirmed. Setting those makes sense even if REGBUF_WILL_INIT is set,
> at least for page masking.
Thanks, I'd forgotten those patches were already posted. Looks good,
so pushed.
Looking around, I noted that contrib/bloom also had the disease of
not telling log_newpage it was writing a standard-format metapage,
so I fixed that too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
