On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > In the attached patch, only automatically-updatable views that do not have > INSTEAD OF rules or INSTEAD OF triggers are lockable. It is assumed that > those views definition have only one base-relation. When an auto-updatable > view is locked, its base relation is also locked. If the base relation is a > view again, base relations are processed recursively. For locking a view, > the view owner have to have he priviledge to lock the base relation.
Why is this the right behavior? I would have expected LOCK TABLE v to lock the view and nothing else. See http://postgr.es/m/AANLkTi=kupesjhrdevgfbt30au_iyro6zwk+fwwy_...@mail.gmail.com for previous discussion of this topic. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
