On 2017-10-24 12:43:12 +0530, amul sul wrote:
> I tried to get suggested SMHasher[1] test result for the hash_combine
> for 32-bit and 64-bit version.
>
> SMHasher works on hash keys of the form {0}, {0,1}, {0,1,2}... up to
> N=255, using 256-N as the seed, for the hash_combine testing we
> needed two hash value to be combined, for that, I've generated 64
> and 128-bit hash using cityhash functions[2] for the given smhasher
> key then split in two part to test 32-bit and 64-bit hash_combine
> function respectively. Attached patch for SMHasher code changes &
> output of 32-bit and 64-bit hash_combine testing. Note that I have
> skipped speed test this test which is irrelevant here.
>
> By referring other hash function results [3], we can see that hash_combine
> test results are not bad either.
>
> Do let me know if current testing is not good enough or if you want me to do
> more testing, thanks.
This looks very good! Both the tests you did, and the results for
hash_combineXX. I therefore think we can go ahead with that formulation
of hash_combine64?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
