2017-10-14 17:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > > When function is overwritten, then regproc result contains schema, > although > > it is on search_path > > There's no "fresh regression" here, it's done that more or less since > we invented schemas. See regprocout: > > * Would this proc be found (uniquely!) by regprocin? If not, > * qualify it. > > git blame dates that comment to commit 52200bef of 2002-04-25. > > Admittedly, qualifying the name might not be sufficient to disambiguate, > but regprocout doesn't have any other tool in its toolbox, so it uses > the hammer it's got. If you're overloading functions, you really need > to use regprocedure not regproc. >
It is false alarm. I am sorry. I shot by self. Thank you for explanation Nice evening. Pavel > regards, tom lane >
