> On 06 Sep 2017, at 14:25, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> Fine for 0002. This reminds me of LockGXact and RemoveGXact in >> twophase.c, as well as _hash_squeezebucket that have some code paths >> that cannot return... Any thoughts about having some kind of >> PG_NOTREACHED defined to 0 which could be put in an assertion? > > Generally we just do "Assert(false)", maybe with "not reached" in a > comment. I don't feel a strong need to invent a new way to do that.
Moving this to the next commitfest and bumping status to Ready for committer based on the discussion in this thread. cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
