Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote:
>> Alright, I've added logging for autovacuum in v23. I ended up needing to
>> do a little restructuring to handle the case when the relation was skipped
>> because the lock could not be obtained. While doing so, I became
>> convinced that LOG was probably the right level for autovacuum logs.
> OK, of course let's not change the existing log levels. This could be
> always tuned later on depending on feedback from others. I can see
> that guc.c also uses elevel == 0 for some logic, so we could rely on
> that as you do.
FWIW, I don't think this patch should be mucking with logging behavior
at all; that's not within its headline charter, and I doubt many people
are paying attention. I propose to commit it without that. If you feel
hot about changing the logging behavior, you can resubmit that as a new
patch in a new thread where it will get some visibility and debate on
its own merits.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
