On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> So, do we want this patch? > > I think we don't really have a lot of choice. I propose applying this > as far back as 9.6 --- anyone think differently?
+1. If applies to 9.5 and 9.4 without a lot of work, I think we should apply it there as well, in case there is out-of-core use of DSM (or, in 9.5, also of ParallelContext). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
