2017-09-22 9:59 GMT+02:00 Peter Moser <pitiz...@gmail.com>: > 2017-09-12 16:33 GMT+02:00 Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com>: > > PostgreSQL tries really very hard to implement the SQL Standard and > > just the standard. ISTM that the feedback you should have been given > > is that this is very interesting but will not be committed in its > > current form; I am surprised to see nobody has said that, though you > > can see the truth of that since nobody is actively looking to review > > or commit this. Obviously if the standard were changed to support > > these things we'd suddenly be interested... > > Ok, we understand that PostgreSQL wants to strictly follow the SQL > standard, which is not yet defined for temporal databases. In this > context we understand your comment and agree on your position. >
ANSI SQL 2011 has temporal data support https://www.slideshare.net/CraigBaumunk/temporal-extensions-tosql20112012010438 Regards Pavel Stehule
