On 20 September 2017 at 17:52, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 20 September 2017 at 16:55, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Gaddam Sai Ram
>> <gaddamsaira...@zohocorp.com> wrote:
>> > Thank you very much! That fixed my issue! :)
>> > I was in an assumption that pinning the area will increase its lifetime
>> but
>> > yeah after taking memory context into consideration its working fine!
>>
>> So far the success rate in confusing people who first try to make
>> long-lived DSA areas and DSM segments is 100%.  Basically, this is all
>> designed to ensure automatic cleanup of resources in short-lived
>> scopes.
>>
>
> 90% ;)
>
> I got it working with no significant issues for a long lived segment used
> to store a pool of shm_mq pairs used for a sort of "connection listener"
> bgworker. Though I only used DSM+ToC, not DSA.
>
>
By the way, dsa.c really needs a cross-reference to shm_toc.c and vice
versa. With a hint as to when each is appropriate.

-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to