On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Rebased patches attached. Because Dilip complained earlier today about >> clauses of the form (const op var) not causing partition-pruning, I've >> added code to commute the clause where it is required. Some other >> previously mentioned limitations remain -- no handling of OR clauses, no >> elimination of redundant clauses for given partitioning column, etc. >> >> A note about 0001: this patch overlaps with >> 0003-Canonical-partition-scheme.patch from the partitionwise-join patch >> series that Ashutosh Bapat posted yesterday [1]. > > It doesn't merely overlap; it's obviously a derivative work,
Yes it is. I noted that upthread [1] that most of these are derived from Ashutosh's patch on his suggestion. I guess I should have repeated that in this message too, sorry. > and the > commit message in your version should credit all the authors. That was a mistake on my part, too. Will be careful hereon. Thanks, Amit [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0e829199-a43c-2a66-b966-89a0020a6cd4%40lab.ntt.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
