On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > Have you had a chance to look at this such that we can expect a rebased > version > of this patch during the commitfest?
Frankly, I think things where there was a ping multiple weeks before the CommitFest started and no rebase before it started should be regarded as untimely submissions, and summarily marked Returned with Feedback. The CommitFest is supposed to be a time to get things that are ready before it starts committed before it ends. Some amount of back-and-forth during the CF is of course to be expected, but we don't even really have enough bandwidth to deal with the patches that are being timely updated, never mind the ones that aren't. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
