A few general comments. While this patch applies, I am still seeing some whitespace errors:
comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.1.patch:488: trailing whitespace. ColId comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.1.patch:490: trailing whitespace. | CURRENT_DATABASE comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.1.patch:491: trailing whitespace. { comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.1.patch:501: trailing whitespace. ColId comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v4.1.patch:502: trailing whitespace. { warning: squelched 9 whitespace errors warning: 14 lines add whitespace errors. It looks like the 'dbname' test is currently failing when you run 'make check-world'. The Travis CI build log [1] shows the details of the failure. From a brief glance, I would guess that some of the queries are returning unexpected databases that are created in other tests. Also, I think this change will require updates to the documentation. + if (dbspecname->dbnametype == DBSPEC_CURRENT_DATABASE ) + dbname = get_database_name(MyDatabaseId); + else + dbname = dbspecname->dbname; This pattern is repeated in the patch several times. It looks like the end goal of these code blocks is either to get the database name or the database OID, so perhaps we should have get_dbspec_name() and get_dbspec_oid() helper functions (like get_rolespec_oid() for RoleSpec nodes). +static bool +_equalDatabaseSpec(const DBSpecName *a, const DBSpecName *b) +{ + COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(dbnametype); + COMPARE_STRING_FIELD(dbname); + COMPARE_LOCATION_FIELD(location); + + return true; +} There are some inconsistencies in the naming strategy. For example, this function is called _equalDatabaseSpec(), but the struct is DBSpecName. I would suggest calling it DatabaseSpec or DbSpec throughout the patch. Nathan [1] https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/275747367 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers