On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 09:58, amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen > > <jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Amul, > >> > >> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote: > >>> > >>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA. > >>> > >> > >> This patch needs a rebase. > >> > > > > Thanks for your note. > > Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head. > > Also added error on > > creating > > d > > efault partition > > for the hash partitioned table > > , > > and updated document & > > test script for the same. > > Sorry, but this needs another rebase as it's broken by commit > 77b6b5e9ceca04dbd6f0f6cd3fc881519acc8714. > > Attached rebased patch, thanks.
Regards, Amul
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v20.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
