I wrote: > Ah. I was not thinking of touching pg_atomic_read_u32/u64_impl, > although now that you mention it, it's not clear to me why we > couldn't simplify
> - return *(&ptr->value); > + return ptr->value; Just to check, I applied that change to pg_atomic_read_u32_impl and pg_atomic_read_u64_impl, and recompiled. I get bit-for-bit the same backend executable. Maybe it would have an effect on some other compiler, but I doubt it, except perhaps at -O0. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers