Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Jeff Janes wrote: > > > I'm attaching a patch for each option. Each one independently solves the > > problem. But I think we should do both. There is no point in issuing > > unnecessary kill system calls, and there may also be more spurious wake-ups > > than just these ones. > > I modified patch 1 a bit -- result attached. I would like to back-patch > this all the way back to 9.4, but there are a few conflicts due to > c29aff959dc so I think I'm going to do pg10 only unless I get some votes > that it should go further back. I think it should be fairly trivial to > resolve.
Pushed patch 1 to master and pg10. Please add the other one to commitfest. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
