Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yeah, I've been getting that since Wednesday morning (west coast USA time), and reported it Wednesday evening, but no one else has replied to that post, so I thought maybe it was somehow related to the othee ecpg issues being discussed.
I've committed fixes for the problems noted by gcc. I wouldn't care to bet that the code actually works though. The HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP paths in ecpg seem to be totally untested :-(
Thanks, Tom. It does at least compile cleanly now. I don't use ecpg, so I can't say whether the changes actually work.
Joe
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
