On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Migration to Version 10 > > > > "A dump/restore using pg_dumpall, or use of pg_upgrade, is required > > for those wishing to migrate data from any previous release." > > > > This isn't true and is seriously misleading ... > > Fair point. > > > since pglogical and other > > proprietary tools exist that were designed specifically to allow this. > > Suggested additional wording would be... > > > > "If upgrading from a 9.4 server or later, external utilities using > > logical decoding, such as pglogical or proprietary alternatives, can > > also provide an alternate route, often with lower downtime." > > It's not really true that the only alternatives to pglogical are > proprietary. Really, one could use any logical replication solution, > and there have been multiple open source alternatives for a decade. > > > Our docs mention pglogical already, so don't see an issue with > > mentioning it here. > > The existing reference is alongside a bunch of other third-party > tools. Mentioning it at the very top of our release notes would give > it a pride of place with which I'm not too comfortable. > I agree that singling it out there is probably not the best idea. But a sentence/paragraph saying that there are third party replication solutions that can solve the problem, along with linking to the page with the list, perhaps? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>