On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Jan Wieck wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > > > >> Seems like we should also allow for a windows specific distribution of libpq > >> as well. > > > > I thought that the win32 stuff was being included as part of the base > > distribution? IF so, wouldn't such already be included in any > > libpq.tar.gz we created? Is there a reason why we'd need a > > libpq-win.tar.gz (assuming that that is what you are suggesting?) ... ? > > I think he meant a separate binary, somehow installer-wrapped libpq.dll > - right? > > Honestly I think that doesn't do much for windows. It would only do if > we would add many other, more or less dependant interfaces, like ODBC, > Pgtcl, Pgperl?, JDBC, MyDBC ... but then we get into all the license, > packaging, distribution hassle.
Well, actually, I believe Dave already does up the ODBC driver in binary form ... And dont' we have a 'native, non-cygwin' libpq already? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
