On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Interesting. I was apparently thinking slightly differently. I'd have > thought we'd have Session struct in statically allocated shared > memory. Which'd then have dsa_handle, dshash_table_handle, ... members.
Sounds an awful lot like what we're already doing with PGPROC. I am not sure that inventing a Session thing that should have 500 things in it but actually has the 3 that are relevant to this patch is really a step forward. In fact, it sounds like something that will just create confusion down the road. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
