On 10 August 2017 at 23:25, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > I think so - specifically, that it's a leftover from a revision where the > > xid limit was advanced before clog truncation. > > > > I'll be finding time in the next couple of days to look more closely and > > ensure that's all it is. > > A couple of days having gone by without hearing further on this, I'm > going to assume for the moment that my analysis is correct and just > push a commit to remove this assertion. That's not intended to > discourage you from spending further time on this - it would be bad to > be wrong about this - but doing something we all agree is wrong can't > be better than doing something that I, at least, think is correct. > Thanks. Keeps getting bumped down by other things, but it's on the stack to not get lost -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
