On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:09:43PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 8/1/17 00:17, Noah Misch wrote: >> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, >> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this >> > open >> > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as >> > a >> > v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on >> > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days >> > of >> > this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers >> > may >> > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all >> > fixed >> > well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your >> > efforts >> > toward speedy resolution. Thanks. >> >> I'm looking into this now and will report by Friday. > > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
I think this open item has closed by the commit 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8 ? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
