Michael, * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Do you need a back-patchable version for 9.6? I could get one out of > >> my pocket if necessary. > > > > I was just trying to find a bit of time to generate exactly that- if > > you have a couple spare cycles, it would certainly help. > > OK, here you go. Even if archive_mode = always has been introduced in > 9.5, but non-exclusive mode is a 9.6 feature, so here are patches down > to this version. I am pretty satisfied by this, and I included all the > comments and error message corrections reviewed up to now. I noticed > some incorrect comments, doc typos and an incorrect indentation as > well for the WARNING reported to the user when waiting for the > archiving.
Thanks much for this. I've looked over it some and it looks pretty good to me. I'm going to play with it a bit more and, barring issues, will push them tomorrow morning. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
