On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Of course. It's also a heck of a lot more flexible. Adding on another > ad-hoc option that does the minimum possible amount of work needed to > address one specific problem is always going to be less work; but after > we repeat that process five or ten times, we're going to have a mess.
Well, I still like Masahiko-san's proposal, but I'm not prepared to keep arguing about it right now. Maybe some other people will weigh in with an opinion. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
