2017-07-26 15:27 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Remi Colinet <remi.coli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > test=# SELECT  pid, ppid, bid, concat(repeat(' ', 3 * indent),name),
> value,
> > unit FROM pg_progress(0,0);
> >   pid  | ppid | bid |      concat      |      value       |  unit
> > -------+------+-----+------------------+------------------+---------
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 | status           | query running    |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 | relationship     | progression      |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |    node name     | Sort             |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |    sort status   | on tapes writing |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |    completion    | 0                | percent
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |    relationship  | Outer            |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |       node name  | Seq Scan         |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |       scan on    | t_10m            |
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |       fetched    | 25049            | block
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |       total      | 83334            | block
> >  14106 |    0 |   4 |       completion | 30               | percent
> > (11 rows)
> >
> > test=#
>
> Somehow I imagined that the output would look more like what EXPLAIN
> produces.
>

me too.

Regards

Pavel


>
> > If the one shared memory page is not enough for the whole progress
> report,
> > the progress report transfert between the 2 backends is done with a
> series
> > of request/response. Before setting the latch, the monitored backend
> write
> > the size of the data dumped in shared memory and set a status to indicate
> > that more data is to be sent through the shared memory page. The
> monitoring
> > backends get the result and sends an other signal, and then wait for the
> > latch again. The monitored backend does not collect a new progress report
> > but continues to dump the already collected report. And the exchange
> goes on
> > until the full progress report has been dumped.
>
> This is basically what shm_mq does.  We probably don't want to
> reinvent that code, as it has taken a surprising amount of debugging
> to get it fully working.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

Reply via email to