Aizaz Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 11:52, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Are you suggesting putting a copy of the list of GUCs in a system table? I'd
>> be for that ....
> hmmm ... I thought what this meant was that we don't factor the tables
> out into guc_vars.h, but leave them in guc.c. (adding the descriptions
> etc. there). In 'bootstrap' mode, main.c can output the values without
> ever connecting to the database ...
Right. There is a separate proposal on the table to make more of the
guc.c tabular information visible in the pg_settings view, so that
clients of a running database can get at it. That's independent of what
you're doing though. See pgsql-patches a day or two back, and
discussion a little before that on (I think) pgsql-general.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
