On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 21 June 2017 at 16:15, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:08:35 +0530 >> Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >>> > >>> > Attached is a patch for the documentation fix. >>> > >>> Please attach the patch as well. :-) >> >> I'm sorry, I forgot it. I attahed this. > > Thanks, will apply.
The patch is adjusting documentation for the observed behaviour. But I don't see a justification as to why the observed behaviour is correct one? Was there a commit which allowed startup process to be part of pg_stat_activity but forgot to update the documentation or the current behaviour is unintentional and probably needs to be fixed? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
