On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-05 15:45:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote: > > > Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David > Steele's > > > comments. > > > Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by > David > > > Steele up-thread. > > > > > > Attached the latest code and test patch. > > > > My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given > > that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to > > change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10. > > Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF. > > Craig, Vaishnavi, everyone else: Are you planning to continue to work on > this for v11? I'm willing to do another round, but only if it's > worthwhile. > Yes, am willing to continue working on this patch for v11. > > FWIW, I still think this needs a pgbench or similar example integration, > so we can actually properly measure the benefits. > I will investigate on this further. Thanks & Regards, Vaishnavi, Fujitsu Australia.
