Kevin Grittner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2017-06-14 11:48:25 +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> >> P.S. Does this use case (do not retry transaction with serialization or > >> deadlock failure) is most interesting or failed transactions should be > >> retried (and how much times if there seems to be no hope of success...)? > > > > I can't quite parse that sentence, could you restate? > > The way I read it was that the most interesting solution would retry > a transaction from the beginning on a serialization failure or > deadlock failure. As far as I understand her proposal, it is exactly the opposite -- if a transaction fails, it is discarded. And this P.S. note is asking whether this is a good idea, or would we prefer that failing transactions are retried. I think it's pretty obvious that transactions that failed with some serializability problem should be retried. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
