On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I have merged Rafia's patch for cosmetic changes. I have also fixed
> some of the changes you have recommended over that. But kept few as it
> is since Rafia's opinion was needed on that.
>
Few comments on the latest patch:
1.
+ /* Check whether blocknum is valid and within fork file size. */
+ if (blk->blocknum >= nblocks)
+ {
+ /* Move to next forknum. */
+ ++pos;
+ old_blk = blk;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Prewarm buffer. */
+ buf = ReadBufferExtended(rel, blk->forknum, blk->blocknum, RBM_NORMAL,
+ NULL);
+ if (BufferIsValid(buf))
+ ReleaseBuffer(buf);
+
+ old_blk = blk;
+ ++pos;
You are incrementing position at different places in this loop. I
think you can do it once at the start of the loop.
2.
+dump_now(bool is_bgworker)
{
..
+ fd = OpenTransientFile(transient_dump_file_path,
+ O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, 0666);
+prewarm_buffer_pool(void)
{
..
+ file = AllocateFile(AUTOPREWARM_FILE, PG_BINARY_R);
During prewarm, you seem to be using binary mode to open a file
whereas during dump binary flag is not passed. Is there a reason
for such a difference?
3.
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errmsg("saved metadata info of %d blocks", num_blocks)));
It doesn't seem like a good idea to log this info at each dump
interval. How about making this as a DEBUG1 message?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
